澳门六合开奖记录

Hasan II, 鈥楢la Dhikrihi鈥檒 Salam, Nizari Isma鈥榠li Imam and the fourth ruler of Alamut (557-61 AH/1162-66 CE). Born in 520AH /1126 CE, Imam Hasan II, whom the Nizaris address as 鈥榓la Dhikrihi鈥檒 Salam (on his mention be peace), succeeded to the leadership of the Nizari Isma鈥榠li da鈥榳a and state on the death of the third ruler of Alamut, Muhammad b. Buzurg-Umid on 4 Rabi鈥 I 557 AH/ 21 February 1162 CE.

Imam Hasan is said to have developed an early interest in learning Isma鈥榠li doctrines as well as studying philosophical and Sufi writings. In particular, he became well-versed in 迟补鈥檞颈濒, or esoteric exegesis, which had been applied by the Isma鈥榠lis to Qur鈥檃nic passages as well as the commandments and prohibitions of the shari鈥榓 (Islamic law).

Already in the time of Muhammad b. Buzurg -Umid (532-57 AH/1138-62 CE), Imam Hasan II had acquired followers who regarded him as the Imam promised by Hasan al-Sabbah, the first ruler of Alamut. Left without a manifest Imam since Imam Nizar b. al-Mustansir鈥檚 death in 488 AH/1095 CE, the Nizaris had acknowledged Muhammad b. Buzurg-Umid and his predecessors at Alamut merely as 诲补鈥榠s and hujjas, or chief representatives, of their hidden Imams.

The most important event of Imam Hasan II鈥檚 brief reign was his declaration of theqiyama (the Resurrection), which initiated a new phase in the history of the Nizaris of the Alamut period (483-654 AH/1090-1256 CE). After making careful preparations, in a solemn ceremony at Alamut on 17 Ramadan 559 AH/ 8 August 1164 CE, in the presence of representatives from different Nizari territories who had been summoned there, Imam Hasan II delivered a khutba听and passed on new instructions from the Nizari Imam; according to these instructions the Nizaris had now been brought to the听qiyama鈥攖he Resurrection was upon them. Soon afterwards, on 28 Dhu鈥檒-qi鈥榙a 559 AH/ 18 October 1164 CE, a similar ceremony was held at the castle of Mu鈥檓in-Abad to the east of Birjand, the local headquarters of the Nizaris in Quhistan. On that occasion Imam Hasan II鈥檚 new declarations were read out to the representatives of the Nizaris of that region by Ra鈥檌s Muzaffar, themuhtasham,听or chief, of the Quhistani Nizaris. The ruler of Alamut had now also announced that, just as previously the Fatimid Imam al-Mustansir had been God鈥檚听khalifa听on earth, so now Imam Hasan II himself was that听khalifa. In other words, Imam Hasan II had now also claimed the Nizari Imamate听for himself, at least implicitly. Subsequently, Imam Hasan II in his epistles (fusul) implied more clearly that he was the Imam, the son of an Imam from the progeny of Imam Nizar b. al- Mustansir, even though he had been considered to be the son of Muhammad b. Buzurg-Umid. The contemporary Nizaris accepted this claim, which was reiterated more explicitly by Imam Hasan II鈥檚 son and successor ImamNural-Din听Muhammad. It fell to Rashid al-Din Sinan (d. 589 AH/ 1193 CE), the most famous of the Nizari听诲补鈥榠s in Syria and the original 鈥淥ld Man of the Mountain鈥 of the Crusaders, to declare theqiyama听to the Syrian Nizaris soon after 559 AH/ 1164 CE.

By declaring the听qiyama, Imam Hasan II had in effect announced the Last Day, which was eventually interpreted to mean the manifestation of the unveiled truth (haqiqa)听that had hitherto been hidden in the听batin听or esoteric dimension of the Islamic message.

This was made manifest in the person of the Nizari Imam, who, as the enunciator of the听qiyama, the 鈥渜a鈥檌m听al-qiyama,鈥 held a rank even higher than that of an ordinary Imam. As a result, the members of the Nizari community who acknowledged the Nizari Imam were now capable of understanding the true esoteric meaning of the religious laws, and as such, Paradise was actualised for them in this world.

Joveyni, Rashid al-Din, and Kashani, who are the main authorities on the history of the Persian Nizari state, relate that, in line with the circumstances expected in the听qiyama, the final eschatological听dawr听(era of human history), Imam Hasan II also announced the abrogation of [blind observance of] the听shari鈥榓, which had been enforced rigorously by his predecessors at Alamut.

In view of the absence of contemporary Nizari sources from the听qiyama听times and the negative bias of the non-Isma鈥榠li sources on the subject, it is difficult to know for certain how the declaration of the听qiyama听was actually perceived by the Nizaris, who continued to regard themselves as Isma鈥榠li Shi鈥榠.

At any rate, Joveyni and other anti-Isma鈥榠li authorities, despite their hostile stances, do not report any instances of libertine and permissivist behavior amongst the Persian Nizaris immediately after the听qiyama, even though the Nizari leadership had now begun to stress the spiritual inner-interpretation of the law in preference to the blind observance of its literal meaning.

On Sunday 6 Rabi鈥 I 561 AH/ 9 January 1166 CE, Hasan II听鈥榓la Dhikrihi鈥檒 Salam听was stabbed to death in the castle of Lammasar (Lanbasar; west of Alamut) by Hasan b. Namavar, a brother-in-law who opposed his new policies.

Imam Hasan鈥檚 son and successor, Imam Nur al-Din Muhammad, devoted his own long reign (561-607 AH/ 1166-1210 CE) to a systematic elaboration of the doctrine of the听qiyama.

Bibliography

Primary sources

鈥楢la鈥 al-Din Joveyni,听Ta鈥檙ikh-e jahan goshay,听ed. Muhammad Qazvini, Leiden, 1912-37, III, pp. 225-39; tr. John A. Boyle, Manchester, II, pp. 688-97.

Abu鈥檒-Qasim 鈥楢bd-Allah b. 鈥楢li Kashani,听Zubdat al-tawarikh: bakhsh-e Fatimian wa Nizarian, ed. Muhammad-Taqi Danishpazhuh, 2nd ed., Tehran, 1366 Sh./1987, pp. 199-208.

Abu Eshaq Quhistani,听Haft听bab, ed. and tr. Wladimir Ivanow, Bombay, 1959, text: pp. 19, 24, 38-44, 46-47, 53, 58, 65; translation: pp. 19, 23, 38-44, 46-47, 53-54, 58, 65.

Rashid-al-Din Fadl-Allah,听Jami鈥 al-tawarikh: qismat-e Esma鈥榠lian, ed. Muhammad-Taqi Danishpazhuh and M. Mudarrisi-Zanjani, Tehran, 1338 Sh./1959, pp. 162-70.

Anon.,听Haft bab-e Baba Sayyedna, in听Two Early 澳门六合开奖记录 Treatises, ed. Wladimir Ivanow, Bombay, 1933, pp. 4-44.

Secondary sources

Henry Corbin, 鈥淗uiti猫me centenaire d鈥橝lamut,鈥澨Mercure de France, February, 1965, pp. 285-304.

鈥 鈥,听Cyclical Time and Ismaili Gnosis, London, 1983, pp. 47-58, 97, 117, 155-56.

Farhad Daftary,听The Isma鈥榠lis: Their History and Doctrines, Cambridge, 1990, pp. 385-92, 400-402, 408, 410-11, 415.

鈥 鈥, 鈥淧ersian Historiography of the Early Nizari Isma鈥榠lis,鈥澨Iran听30, 1992, pp. 91-97.

鈥 鈥,听The Assassin Legends: Myths of the Isma鈥榠lis, London, 1994, pp. 40-41, 42, 78-79, 99, 145-46, 178.

Marshall G. S. Hodgson,听The Order of Assassins, The Hague, 1955, pp. 148-59, 279-324 (containing the Eng. tr. of the anonymous听Haft bab-e Baba Sayyedna).

Christian Jambet,听La grande r茅surrection d鈥橝lamut, Lagrasse, 1990, especially pp. 35-73, 95-135, 295 ff.

Ismail K. Poonawala,听Biobibliography of Isma鈥榠li Literature, Malibu, Calif., 1977, pp. 257-58.

Author

Dr Farhad Daftary

Co-Director and Head of the Department of Academic Research and Publications

An authority in Shi'i studies, with special reference to its Ismaili tradition, Dr. Daftary has published and lectured widely in these fields of Islamic studies. In 2011 a Festschrift entitledFortresses of the Intellect听was produced to honour Dr. Daftary by a number of his colleagues and peers.

Read more